Category: REVIEWS (Page 2 of 4)

“Jurassic World: Dominion” Review | THE MAVERICK OPINION

The final Jurassic Park film is here. A franchise dating back to 1993 has finally come to an end by bringing back all the original cast along with the new generation for one final fight against mad scientists and dinosaurs. It’s hard to believe there have been six films in the Jurassic Park franchise. I don’t think anybody would have expected that nearly 30 years ago, but they’ve been fun, to say the least. Jurassic Park: Dominion it’s about the world trying to coexist with dinosaurs after they have pretty much escaped from the theme parked islands they came from. The big question still looms, can man and dinosaurs coexist and how will it affect the current ecological system. At the beginning of the movie, we find Owen and Claire Protecting the young girl they rescued in the last film. And while they are not exactly newcomers, we reintroduce old characters, Alan Grant, Ellie Sattler, and Ian Malcolm from the original movie. At the center of the story is the crazy mad scientist with his billion-dollar company trying to control dinosaurs and genetically alter them or learn from their DNA in an effort to cure disease and hunger, of course, for a profit. He’s Jurassic Park’s version of Dr. Frankenstein. And yes, we have seen this before in the world of Jurassic Park. They are scientists with good intentions or so it would seem.

Jurassic  World: Dominion is a fun movie, and it was nice to get the old gang back together, witch a connection to the original film because having Laura Dern, Sam Neill, and Jeff Goldblum back together again always makes for a good film. But I question whether it was necessary, did we really need them or was it just for the sake of nostalgia? I’m not saying I didn’t enjoy the movie, but there was nothing in this movie that I hadn’t seen before. If this film is anything then it’s a great bookend to a fun franchise by connecting two generations in the Jurassic Park franchise. It’s kind of like the Rise of Skywalker, but for the Jurassic Park universe. It’s fun and nostalgic, but you’ve seen it all before, and everybody is there just to remind you why you loved the original film in the franchise, to begin with. There are a lot of great action scenes, and it does truly feel like a globetrotting adventure. Chris Pratt is great as Owen and who doesn’t love Bryce Dallas Howard. Jeff Goldblum is always entertaining as Dr. Ian Malcolm, but it’s all way too familiar with nothing new and that is the film’s biggest flaw. I have no complaints about the characters, I love them all, and having them all work together is cool. Sam Neil and Laura Dern are just as lovely as ever and will you feel like you’re watching the first film all over again. But the sad truth is nothing can quite capture the magic of the first Jurassic Park film. Mostly what works in this film are the great action sequences and the fantastic chemistry among the cast.

As much as I liked this film, the plot was filled with old tropes and the mad scientist is the same kind of Dr. Frankenstein we’ve seen before in films, just in different clothing. And this mad scientist wasn’t even that good. Nothing against Campbell Scott as an actor, but we expect our mad scientists to be a little bit more flamboyant, especially when they feel like what they do isn’t wrong. I guess the film is the ultimate metaphor that humanity doesn’t learn from its mistakes, and they really are a stupid species. But I don’t need to watch a Jurassic Park film to know that and there are much better stories that perpetuate that truth. This is a typical summer blockbuster movie with lots of great action and fantastic monsters where you don’t really need a good plot. And throughout most of this film, the scenes and the terrain within the film just remind you of what made the original film fantastic. It’s all too similar, but if there are truly some unique action scenes then they would be with the plane crash. Then again, it’s not like we haven’t seen a plane crash in Jurassic Park. Didn’t that happen in the third film? However, Jurassic Park has become an old and tired franchise that doesn’t have any legs left to stand on so I’m glad that this is the final film. I’m not saying it’s a terrible film, as I said, it’s a great bookend to the franchise. It’s just an okay film trying to capture the same old magic and doesn’t really deliver. It’s not like this year’s Top Gun: Maverick or not only does it capture the same feeling magic from the original film but goes beyond. Jurassic  World: Dominion is a stylish film, but at times even the dinosaurs look too animatronic.

If you go see this film, see a matinee, that’s my recommendation. There was really no reason to make this Jurassic Park film except to have a good ending to the franchise and bring back the original cast. I like nostalgia as much as the next person, but this is a film that can have easily been seen on a streaming service. The only reason that you’ll see this movie in a theater is for all the great action scenes with dinosaurs, but that alone can’t fix the plot. And even though there’s a great social commentary on corporate greed, it’s unnecessary. This film isn’t going to change corporate greed or how humanity feels about it. There’s nothing new that we haven’t seen before. Even the cute story of the raptor, Blue having a child and no one having to rescue that Raptor can’t save this movie. At this point it’s like the Fast and the Furious franchise… You watch the movie because you’ve seen all the rest and you got to see how it ends, you got to complete the journey. I’m not saying that I completely hate the film, but it’s barely average and you shouldn’t pay a full price movie ticket for it. This would be a good film for the dollar theater if they still existed or a good rental. But I will give it a few extra points because it was great to have the original cast back even if it was unnecessary. But hey, sometimes we just need that kind of fun to escape our own shitty world that we live in and at its core, Jurassic Park is a monster movie, they’re good for escape!

Long Awaited Sequel to “Top Gun” Exceeds Expectations: “Top Gun: Maverick” Review | THE MAVERICK OPINION

It’s finally here, the long-awaited sequel to the ’80s cult favorite, Top Gun. If you’re like me, you were probably apprehensive about a sequel to one of the greatest ’80s movies ever.  How could they capture the same old magic! Well, Top Gun Maverick is actually good. This is no joke, it’s a worthy sequel that doesn’t take away from the original film and in a lot of ways makes it better by hitting every emotional and nostalgic note that you would expect from a great sequel. I don’t know if it’s a better movie than the original Top Gun, but it’s at least just as good and for different reasons. Personally, I never expected I would say that in a review because I do love the original film and very, very rarely can you make a sequel that’s just as good if not better. And one of the reasons this sequel works as well as it does is because in the original film we saw Pete “Maverick” Mitchell at the beginning and height of his aviator career, young and cocky, and one of the best pilots in the Navy, but with the sequel, we see a legendary pilot at the tail end of his career wrestling with the ghosts of his past but still trying to be on top as one of the best pilots in the world. You get two very different pilots who are in a lot of ways the same. This makes for a great story and at the very heart of this sequel, you’ll find a great love letter to aviators who have gone through the same thing. They have been the best when they were young and still trying to hold on to that edge while their career was winding down. They captured that beautifully in Maverick. More on that later.

After 30 plus years of service, we see Maverick still flying, but this time he is a test pilot, which seems very appropriate for somebody of his caliber. He is still a Captain even though he should be an Admiral as pointed out by the Ed Harris character we have seen from the trailer who is about to ground him for doing what Maverick always does best, breaking the rules and pushing the envelope as an aviator. We find Maverick in his element as he is attempting to become the fastest pilot alive, a modern-day Chuck Yeager and then he has called back into service to train Top Gun pilots for the riskiest combat mission known to man because there’s only one man who can truly do it. And as you find out there’s still one man in the Navy that believes in Maverick and points out that the Navy still needs a pilot like Maverick. I’m not going to give away spoilers, but only talk about things that you already know. Yes, the man I’m talking about is “Iceman” who is like a three-star admiral and commander of the Pacific Fleet at this point. So, you basically get these two iconic pilots at the end of their careers, but still the old dogs who can teach those young pilots new tricks. And then to add to the emotional weight of the story, one of the pilots the Maverick has to train is none other than Bradley Bradshaw, the son of Goose who has a very contentious relationship with Maverick as you can imagine. Nobody really believes that Maverick is the right man for the job except Iceman because he would know, he’s the one pilot that knows Maverick’s true potential and knows that Maverick really is the right man to train all of these young hotshots for the most dangerous mission that they’ve ever seen because he has the most experience, especially in combat. As I mentioned before, this story is about the main character wrestling with his past, especially with the weight of keeping the son of his best friend who tragically died, alive.

So, what really makes this movie worth watching. Yes, it is one of the best action movies that you’re going to see and all of the aerial footage goes above and beyond and exceeds what we saw in the first film. It makes it even better that they used practical effects and very little CGI. The way they filmed all the aerial shots with cameras in the actual planes brought the intensity level 10-fold and it will keep you on the edge of your seat. This is definitely the kind of movie you want to see in an IMAX theater. It was beautifully shot and although it might feel like a Mission Impossible movie, but with jets, you can’t help but be amazed at how they shot this film. That alone would make this a fun movie to see in the theater, but there’s so much going on with the story, especially the juxtaposition of Maverick from the first film to what he’s dealing with in this film that makes this movie more emotional. It’s not hard to connect to the characters. I think in a lot of ways I connected more to these characters than I did in the first film, especially Maverick because of all the weight that’s on his shoulders as a pilot. He’s having to be a father figure to Bradley Bradshaw and reconcile the past where he feels responsible for his father’s death even if it wasn’t his fault. But you add more to that emotional weight with the type of mission they’re going to have to fly. Now, I won’t tell you what the mission is, you’re just going to have to go see the movie and find out. I will say that it’s very different from the dog fights we saw in the original movie. Warfare isn’t exactly the same anymore, so they’re training for how we would fight in the modern age, especially when planes are used to bomb enemy sites. I still like the original movie better in the sense that you knew who the enemy was and it was a straight-up old-school dogfight with a very clear enemy. One of my critiques of this film is you don’t really know who the enemy is, but it also kind of makes sense who the enemy is and why America is at that war with them. That’s all I can really say without spoiling anything. Whereas the original movie was very much an 80s Cold War film, this is very much modern warfare and part of what all the pilots are dealing with is knowing that they are kind of obsolete, that technology is so advanced that you can pilot an airplane without the pilot. However, the story addresses the fact that there’s a reason we still need pilots who have good instincts and are trained in dogfighting, especially with an enemy that has Superior planes. Sometimes an aerial battle comes down to the man in the “box” and who has the better skills.

Tom Cruise did an amazing job! I actually liked his performance as Maverick better in this film because he does show a character with much more experience and also wrestling with his past as well as knowing that the end is in sight as a pilot. He’s very much aware that this is probably his last mission and plays the role of the old pilot who knows more than the young pilots he’s training.  He’s essentially the “Viper” character from the original movie.   Really, the entire cast was great. Glen Powell did an amazing job playing in modern-day version of Iceman, the cocky pilot who knows he’s the best. And for those of you who might miss Charlie as the love interest for Maverick from the first film, you will quickly forget her with Jennifer Connelly’s performance as Penny Benjamin. It’s not really a spoiler thanks to imdb.com, but she is playing that Penny Benjamin that’s mentioned in the first movie, the admiral’s daughter. She plays a character that clearly has a long history of an on and off again relationship with Maverick. You can say that she’s Maverick’s true love and somehow, they always come back to each other.  Jennifer Connelly was great and in some ways better than Kelly McGillis. It’s very easy to connect with her as the love interest and nothing against Kelly McGillis, she was great in Top Gun even if it wasn’t her best movie… I still think Witness is her best movie. But the performances truly drive the emotional part of this story and make this a film much more than just a great action movie with jets. However, if there is one performance, one scene that makes this film worth it, it is the reunion of Val Kilmer and Tom Cruise playing Maverick and Iceman in a scene together. Their scene is even more emotional knowing that Val Kilmer lost his voice due to throat cancer and I have to commend the writers for how they cleverly dealt with that issue. But everything that we love about Val Kilmer as an actor is all in that scene. If it doesn’t bring you to tears, then you have no connection to the original movie and you’re probably not a Val Kilmer fan even though you should be.

Sometimes I hate being a critic, but I have to be one with this film even though I loved it. Even though it’s a movie that you will want to see a few times in the theater, it isn’t perfect. Beyond all the tugs at those emotional strings, you will to the original Top Gun movie, there’s still some problems with it. Are they enough to make you not watch the movie, hell no, go buy your tickets now!  But here are some of the things that I would have loved to have seen from this movie. I always talk about pacing in movies and sometimes movies can either be too long or not long enough. This is one of those times where I feel like an extra 15 or 20 minutes would have made this movie perfect. Here’s why. Because it’s such a great action movie with all of the aerial footage, especially the training sessions at Top Gun in the first half of the movie, the film moves so fast that sometimes it’s hard to catch your breath. Yes, all of these scenes are great, but this sequel is over 30 years removed from the original that we have to get to know Maverick again. What happened with his career over 30 years.  Yes, it’s brilliant to have him be a test pilot at the beginning of the movie and see where he’s ended up, but we really don’t know anything of his career except for some very quick conversations with Penny Benjamin. We also get a very brief description of their history as well as how Maverick has watched Bradley Bradshaw while trying to direct his career.  Between all the action scenes we get these little glimpses where I feel like, if the film would have been a little bit longer, we would have gotten more story and it would’ve slowed everything down so that the movie doesn’t feel so rushed because of the action. In the first half of the movie, it feels like one big action movie with some quick comedic scenes between these characters you’re only getting to know again. It isn’t until the scene between Iceman and Maverick that the movie slows down before its climax with the final mission. That’s where that extra time in the movie could have helped because pouring over the history of these characters and how they’ve ended up at this point is just as important as all of the action. But I feel like it’s that one scene that finally slows the movie down to where you aren’t so rushed and when you get to the end of the film with Maverick and Rooster having to work together to complete the mission, well, it makes the emotional connection between these characters much more vibrant. I loved all the action, but I don’t want to watch a Top Gun movie that really just feels like a Mission Impossible movie with jets and unfortunately that’s kind of what the first half did. I’m not saying it’s bad, I’m just saying they could have done a better job to make this movie perfect.

My other major critique and it’s kind of minor, but it really goes into my nostalgia for the original film, it’s the soundtrack. I think for people who grew up with the original film and it’s soundtrack will find it hard to disagree with me. Nothing against Lady Gaga and her Hold My Hand song that seems to be the anthem for Top Gun: Maverick, but the original soundtrack was so much better and her song doesn’t hold a candle to You’ve Lost That Loving Feeling… I’m sorry, but it just doesn’t. The soundtrack is okay and of course, having a nice nostalgic moment where Bradley Bradshaw is playing Great Balls of Fire in a Bar is cool, but let’s be honest, we aren’t going to remember the soundtrack to this movie as much as we will with the original film 30 years from now.  There’s just too many iconic songs from the original movie that could have been played again in the sequel, after all, the movie starts off with Danger Zone just like in the original and it works. So, with that said, we can’t have a beach scene with the song, Playing with the Boys. You can’t put You’ve Lost That Loving Feeling in this movie and have modern-day pilots sing it just like pilots from the ’80s, you’re telling me that it still wouldn’t work… Nonsense! Maybe these are all just minor critiques, but I do feel like they’re important enough that would have helped make the movie perfect.

The bottom line, Top Gun Maverick is a masterpiece of a sequel… It may not be as good as the original, but I think it’s just as good and with a great story. The action in this movie does improve from the original because technology has allowed filmmakers to do more than they could have in the 80s with the aerial footage. It’s a hell of a ride that should be seen in an IMAX theater to get the best experience of this film, but because there are so many emotional connections to the original film with these characters, it makes it much more than just an action movie. I think its more than just a summer blockbuster. As I said before, it’s a great love letter to aviators even if the aerial footage is over the top and can’t really be done… That’s not the point! It’s still a fun movie and will remind you why we still love Pete “Maverick” Mitchell! This movie reminds us why he is still the best fictional pilot on the big screen. He’s the old dog that we still love and plays a great father figure to the son of his best friend. There’s a lot of emotional parts to this movie that can bring you to tears if you love the original film. But for the newcomers, it’s just a fun movie and it’s not so over the top and silly that it makes you feel like you’re watching a Fast and the Furious movie with jets and you just roll your eyes at the absurdity. It’s the perfect sequel to a movie that probably didn’t need one, but it works in every possible way and brings the story of Top Gun full circle. No, I won’t give it a perfect 10, but this movie is so good that I can’t be over-critical because I have to admit, I loved it and can’t wait to see it again. And I bet once you see it, you’ll agree with me. Top Gun: Maverick is a winner and it was worth the wait despite two years of delays. Maybe that’s the true success of this movie that despite all the delays, it’s still one of the best movies that you should see in a movie theater. And yes, Top Gun: Maverick is one of the best sequels ever made right up there with, dare I say, The Empire Strikes Back!

The Lincoln Lawyer: Season 1 Review | THE MAVERICK OPINION

The Lincoln Lawyer comes to Netflix. It’s a series based on Michael Connelly’s famed lawyer series about Mickey Haller. And for the first time, somebody got the character right. No offense to the Matthew McConaughey movie that came out years ago, it was entertaining, but Matthew McConaughey didn’t exactly fit the profile of the character. After all, Mickey Haller is half American and half Mexican and as described in the books looks a little South of the border. The series focuses on the second Lincoln Lawyer book called The Brass Verdict whereas the movie with Matthew McConaughey was actually based on the first novel so in a way, the series is just continuing the character’s story from the movie and that’s one of the best parts about this series as it keeps a linear story. In addition, Netflix for the most part found the perfect actor to play Mickey Haller, Manuel Garcia-Rulfo. He’s a Hispanic-American actor dad and embodies this character a lot better than Matthew McConaughey did in the movie. It’s a good series and one that you should get into especially if you’re already done with Ozark. While the movie was entertaining and gave a cliff notes version of the first novel, this 10-episode series really does get to explore who the character is and the big case that he will take on after being away from the law for 18 months. He’s still the confident defense attorney he always was, but this time he takes over the law practice of a fellow defense attorney that he had dealings with in the past and along with it a high-profile murder case of a producer who was accused of murdering his wife and her lover. As we’ve talked about before in reviews, sometimes an 8 to 10 episode series is better to fully flush out a story than a 2-hour movie. I think they did a lot better job with the character from Michael Connelly’s books than the previous movie did.

What makes this series worth watching is the whole of the story isn’t crammed into two hours, it slowly takes you into the investigation with this high profile also introducing you to the main character. Even if you’ve never read the books or seen the previous movie after 10 episodes you will feel like you know Micky Haller. Not only do you get to really see him try a case in a court of law over multiple episodes the story doesn’t feel rushed and it takes the time for the audience to really get to know all of the characters. That was one of my criticisms of the movie because as entertaining as Matthew McConaughey was in the film, there’s so much going on that you really don’t have time to stop and breathe or get to know the characters. One of the more interesting things about the main character is he has two ex-wives, one he shares a daughter with and one that actually works for him. This story is his foray back into the law. It’s a high-profile case and you immediately get the sense that he’s not up to the challenge, but step by step over 10 episodes you see him come back into his own and become the great defense attorney he was always known for. What makes this story strong and a great show to check out on Netflix is the performances from the cast. Manuel Garcia-Rulfo is definitely a better choice to play the character than Matthew McConaughey, it’s almost as if he was born to play this character. Neve Campbell does an incredible job playing his first ex-wife and mother of his child. I don’t know if she was any better than Marisa Tomei from the film, but she does an equally adequate job of portraying the character. The best scenes in the movie are him in court. Where has the movie had very few scenes where he got the shine, there’s a lot more in this series. But also, you get this really great investigation and how two of his cases were connected to each other. Everybody did a great job and I think The Lincoln Lawyer stories are definitely better suited as a series than trying to do a movie.

I don’t really have many complaints about the series, I very much enjoyed it. But, because it’s a story written by Michael Connelly who also does the Harry Bosch novels, it also very much feels like a Harry Bosch story. You almost expect Harry Bosch to pop in at some point. And here’s a little-known fact that you may not be aware of unless you’ve read the books, Harry Bosch is his older half-brother. It actually, kind of explains that in the new Bosch Legacy series on Amazon through a flashback, but my point is you feel like these two characters would be working together to solve a crime. It has the same feel as the show Bosch as all of the character’s lives intertwined with one another so while this might seem like a complaint, it really isn’t, I think fans will want a crossover of some sort is all I’m saying and there are crossovers within the novels. The other critique that I have is the show doesn’t fully explore his relationship with his daughter which is prevalent throughout the books. It seems like all the other relationships with the characters were fully fleshed out over 10 episodes, but that was the one that was neglected the most. Hopefully, that will be fixed if there is a season too. With this being the first season and reducing this character to the law after an 18-month absence the series does have a hard time balancing him getting back into the swing of things and the courtroom aspect of the story. I don’t know if it was balanced enough in the right way, especially with the narration of Mickey explaining his process to his new driver that he meets in the first episode. The first season has to make enough time for the audience to get to know the main character. I feel like we’re just getting started and this is why we will need at least a season two on Netflix. But overall, there isn’t much to complain about, it’s easy to get through these 10 episodes and feel like you have a complete story just like Bosch on Amazon. As I said it very much has the same feel.

This is a good series to check out on Netflix and they do the story right by having it played out over 10 episodes. This is another example of why you need multiple episodes to tell a proper story. The cast is great especially Manuel Garcia-Rulfo as Micky Haller. Just like with Bosch, they found the perfect actor to play this character and if you’re a fan of the Bosch series, then you will definitely like this so it’s certainly worth checking out. The first season does a great job introducing us to this character and his world even if it’s based on the second novel of The Lincoln Lawyer series. You don’t have to read the books or watch the movie to be familiar with anything, this is a good starting point. With LA as the perfect backdrop for a location, it lends itself as its own character in the story so that you don’t feel like this story can take place anywhere and that’s certainly a good thing. I highly recommend The Lincoln Lawyer for your next series on Netflix, even if you’re not a fan of courtroom dramas, the investigation aspect of this story is great. Also, the characters are easy to connect with and are entertaining enough to make you keep watching until the end. Netflix has done a good job with this series and hopefully, we’ll get more seasons based on other books because Mickey Haller is one of the more interesting fictional lawyers who definitely needs to be explored through a series on a streaming channel. And this series will pretty much make you forget that there is a Matthew McConaughey movie about The Lincoln Lawyer.

“Operation Mincemeat” Review | THE MAVERICK OPINION

A new espionage movie just hit Netflix, Operation Mincemeat. If you’re looking for a new movie to watch on Netflix then check it out. It is a story of the greatest intelligence/spy mission during World War II that completely fooled and humiliated Nazi Germany and Adolf Hitler. It was a ruse designed to fool the Germans into thinking that the allied forces were going to land in Greece, but in actuality, they landed in Sicily which began their invasion of Italy.  It was a turning point in World War II. This is the story of how it happened. Much like Great British espionage thrillers, stories like Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy or even a good James Bond novel, this movie might seem fictional and just a great espionage story, but what makes it fantastic is knowing that it actually happened. Plus this movie is very faithful to real-life events. And in case you’re wondering, yes, a young Ian Fleming, who worked for Naval intelligence during World War II was part of the operation and this experience as well as many other experiences which led him to create probably the most popular spy in pop culture… James Bond.

I thoroughly enjoyed this movie, but I’m also a huge fan of espionage thrillers, having grown up reading these kinds of books. The story takes place in 1943 when allied forces were trying to figure out how to get a foothold deep into Europe and invade enemy territories. At this point, Allied forces had only reached as far as England, so this is why this particular intelligence operation was so important. It involved a dead body, floating in a sea with fake documents of War plans about a fake invasion off the coast of Spain because Spain fed information to the Nazis all with the hope that the Germans would take the bait. They did and no, that’s not really a spoiler, it’s just history. This movie tells the tale of the men involved in the operation and everything they went through down to the most minuscule detail that they had to get right, including a picture of a sweetheart and a full backstory for the floating dead man. The movie would have been entertaining enough just for how the plan came together, but what really makes the movie worth watching is the cast. Starring Colin Firth and Matthew MacFayden, along with Kelly Macdonald, Jason Isaacs, and Johnny Flynn who plays a young Ian Fleming.

Their performances are great and it’s what drives this movie as they’re planning every detail in the basements of London, where Naval intelligence and the precursor to MI5 worked. The story almost feels like a documentary because there’s so much detail involved about what happened. As I said, it’s very faithful to the real story even talking about how a corner had to fake a death by drowning from a corpse that had died of rat poisoning, that’s an interesting story in itself. The only thing that is really dramatized is the romantic interest with some of the characters that never really took place, but it isn’t a distraction to the film to begin with. It has the right amount of pacing that a good espionage thriller should have and even though you know the outcome because of history, the story is told in great fashion which will keep you on the edge of your seat knowing have one thing can go wrong and ruin the entire plan. Great actors who helped drive the story can make this happen in a movie. It’s a period piece so getting the feel of World War II London is probably the hardest part, but because London does feel very much like an old city, they really captured the time period well.

I don’t really have any complaints about this movie, if you’re into espionage thrillers then this is a great one to watch on Netflix. Even if at times it feels like a History Channel retelling, the performances from the cast will keep you interested right to the end. Now the film isn’t without its problems. I would honestly say that the worst part of the film is the poor casting choice of Winston Churchill. Maybe it’s hard to imagine anybody else playing Winston Churchill after Gary alderman had such a brilliant then Oscar-Worthy performance a few years ago, but Simon Russell Beale who plays Churchill just didn’t deliver. Not that he’s a bad actor, he isn’t, he just wasn’t the right choice for this role.  And if I have to be critical, the flashback-type scenes of War doesn’t really do this film Justice… it’s more of a distraction from the overall story, but it’s also brilliantly masked by the great narration of Johnny Flynn. I really enjoyed him as Ian Fleming and if you’ve ever gone back and looked at old interviews with Ian Fleming, Johnny Flynn very much sound like him so there was that rhythm in his voice that made you feel like this was a James Bond story. It’s true that movies on Netflix can be hit or miss, but Operation Mincemeat is one of the better ones that I have seen.

With a great cast as the backbone of the film, Operation Mincemeat delivers and is one that you should watch on Netflix. Colin Firth and Matthew MacFayden are great and provide the driving force behind this film along with Kelly MacDonald, who in a lot of ways feels like the Moneypenny of the story. There’s a lot to like about this movie if you are a fan of classic espionage films. What few problems the film has does not overshadow the brilliant performances and great retelling of this true story during World War II. Also, having someone portray a young Ian Fleming with such a standout performance and knowing that Fleming was actually part of this operation makes the film a little bit better than it probably is. It’s the kind of espionage thriller that makes you feel like you were actually there when it was all happening. And with the exception of the casting choice for Winston Churchill, everybody else was cast perfectly in their roles. I highly recommend this film on Netflix, especially for the spy fans out there.

 

 

Bosch Legacy: Season 1 Review | THE MAVERICK OPINION

Bosch is back. Season 7 may have ended his run as a police officer, but we’ve got Bosch Legacy which gets into his time as a private investigator. Season 1 is out and if you’re a Bosch fan, you’re going to love it. I have to admit, I’m not feeling any loss whatsoever with the cop show ending because Bosch is back and better than ever. It may not be as good, but it’s still great because it’s Harry Bosch and Titus Welliver is always fantastic. Season 1 of Bosch Legacy picks up a year after the events of season 7. Harry is making his way as a private investigator and Maddie is a few months into her first year as an LA police officer. Bosch stays independent, but does investigative work for the lawyer Honey Chandler, who is still recovering from being shot in the last season of Bosch. There are some things that I miss about Bosch like being a police officer, but there’s a lot to like about his character as a private investigator because he has more freedom and doesn’t have to deal with the politics that was always embedded in the LA Police department. And of course, he never takes easy cases and like a good boy scout always does the right thing, especially when he’s hired by a billionaire to find the immigrant mother and son he left behind in his early twenties to go work for his father. The big case of season 1 is Harry trying to track down what happened to them when there aren’t any good records on this Hispanic family.

One of the things I’ve always liked about Bosch as you have multiple storylines going on at the same time. As past seasons went by, Maddie became much more of a prime character, especially after her mother dies so half of this season is about her being a police officer and the daughter of a legacy. Her story is probably a little bit more interesting because it’s about her trying to figure out what kind of police officer, she wants to be especially as her precinct is hunting down a serial rapist.  Bosch had always been more focused on Harry’s investigations, Bosch Legacy is split evenly between him and Maddie and what Honey Chandler’s stories. I enjoyed how they split the stories up and we see how their lives intertwine this particular season. It’s a different style than we’ve normally seen, and I think it works well for all these characters that we’ve come to love. Don’t worry, Harry is still Harry and you get plenty of his way of doing things. However, it’s interesting to watch Maddie grow as a police officer and find where her empathy is when it comes to being a cop. She even questions whether she made the right choice. If you been watching Bosch since the beginning then you don’t have to be reintroduced to everything because the story picks up after season 7, but for those who are coming into it late, you will need to go back and watch the past seasons to understand all of these characters and how they got to this point. This show is for fans who have been there since the beginning, it’s not really for newcomers. But I hope new fans discover Bosch through the series. It’s a 10 episode season and nothing really drags, there’s excitement in every episode and nothing is wasted. I didn’t find any part of it boring or anything lingering too long, 10 episodes was the right amount. It feels very familiar and that’s a good thing. Now there are new characters introduced, especially the tech savvy Mo Bassi who’s basically Oracle to Harry Bosch’s Batman. He also loves jazz so it’s a great partnership between old school and tech school.

Honestly, there’s not really any complaints I have about Bosch Legacy. I do miss how Harry dealt with all the politics in the police force because he was always a thorn in the side of people playing politics and usually did the right thing. One of the advantages of him being a private investigator is he’s basically playing a character that doesn’t have to give a shit unless he wants to. He answers to no one, and he doesn’t play any games, even when people are trying to hunt him down. While Harry definitely gets into gunfights and he can’t necessarily stay away from violence, I do admit that it just isn’t the same as when he was a police officer and have the authority to do stuff. But being a hard-nosed old-school private investigator that kind of takes the law into his own hands makes for an interesting character. Although I thought we always saw that with Harry Bosche so it really isn’t anything new. There isn’t really anything to be disappointed about because it’s still the same old Bosch even though he’s a private investigator now. But one thing to know about this season is it’s not going to be like any other season where they wrap things up until the next big case, this season leaves you with a cliffhanger. I’m warning you now and it will be even more disappointing if we don’t get a season 2, which we probably will because Bosch whether it’s on Amazon or it’s other channel IMDb TV, is still one of the most popular shows on the streaming Network and worth watching.

So, wondering if you should check out Bosch Legacy, well, of course, you should. If you’re a fan of Bosch then it’s a no-brainer, start binge-watching it now and you won’t be disappointed. With the introduction of new characters that are easy to like it adds some new things to the familiarity that you find in Bosch Legacy. And it’s hard not to like Maddie if she has come into her own while trying to figure out what kind of police officer she will be. We’ve watched her grow up on this show,  she is tough as nails and a pain in the ass just like her old man. You could probably do a show of just her as a police officer and it would be great, although it probably is too much like Nathan Fillion’s The Rookie. It will take a little getting used to seeing Bosch as a private investigator, but if you’re a fan of the character then you’ll still like this part of his life. I hope they do more with Maddie and season 2 and from what we’ve seen in this first season, they certainly will. It looks like she’s going to make one hell of a police officer. One of the best things about this series is to see the relationship between Honey Chandler and Harry Bosch since the first time we see them in season 1 is when she’s questioning him on the “stand” and he clearly doesn’t like her. It’s been great to see their relationship blossom. But yes, Bosch Legacy is definitely worth watching, and let’s hope that they continue making more seasons. Harry Bosch never disappoints and having his story and Maddie’s story more intertwined since she’s now the police officer that’s an interesting dynamic to the show. Bosch Legacy is one of the best shows on the Amazon Network just the last 7 seasons of Bosch.

“Texas Filmmaker Doesn’t make the Superhero Movie We Want, but the One We Need!” “Green Ghost” Film Review

When you get together with your friends and make a movie it should always be fun and it should come across in the film. That’s what I saw when watching the Texas film, Green Ghost and the Masters of the Stone. Charlie Clark, an El Paso car dealer made a film about superheroes with a great Hispanic cast including Danny Trejo. Now I know what you’re thinking, some car salesmen just up and made a movie, it can’t be that good! Is it on the same level as a Marvel movie, no, but it doesn’t have to be, to be a fun movie! That’s why we go to the movies, we want to be entertained, we want to have fun. That’s exactly what superhero movies are for, they’re not meant to be Citizen Kane or Schindler’s List. But not all superhero movies have to be on the same level as Marvel or DC, you can still make an independent superhero movie and it can be fun and entertaining. And it can certainly be worth watching! That’s what this movie is.  It was fun and I can’t wait to watch it again. I think the best part about this movie is it doesn’t take itself too seriously, it knows what it is and it’s not trying to be an Avengers Movie or Justice League. The most brilliant part of this movie is the overdubbing and homage to Asian martial arts movies that have bad dubbing. It feels like a martial arts movie from the ’70s.

Who makes those kinds of movies anymore! As I watch the film, I honestly felt like Charlie Clark and people he knew in the film industry just got together and had fun making a movie with a lot of different tropes you see in superhero movies and martial arts movies. Too many times a film will try to be something that it’s not. It’ll try to be too serious when it should just be entertaining. Martial arts action movies aren’t meant to be inspiring and give us great life lessons, we watch them for the action. The same thing with a superhero movie. So when you have a superhero film that is more of a satire about a superhero’s origin story, you have to appreciate that kind of filmmaking. We know what we get with Marvel in DC, but a satire with lots of great action and cool special effects that would rival any Marvel movie, yes please, give me that kind of film just to be entertained.

These are the kinds of movies that turn out to be cult classics. The story is about a car salesman who learns that he is part of a bigger destiny, where he, along with family members have to save the world. He has secret powers and when the family unites, they use the power of a magic Stone to defeat darkness and stave off the Apocalypse. Yes, of course, we’ve heard this kind of story before, but that’s not the point. What if you had a superhero who can’t unlock his full potential unless he wears his Mexican wrestler outfit, hence the Green Ghost, which is brilliant! Sure, it’s a little bit goofy, and of course, you have the drunken martial arts wise men, one of them played by Danny Trejo. Yes, not original, but still funny, just like the machete movies.

My point is sometimes superhero movies take themselves too seriously and to make one that is more of a satire makes for a better film than half the stuff we see every year and review that’s critics. What Charlie Clark is giving us is a fun goofy superhero movie that will keep us entertained and I will even admit that it is a better film than some of the Marvel origin stories. Not only did they put together a great Hispanic cast with Kuno Becker, Marko Zaror, Renée Victor, Sofia Pernas, Elpidia Carrillo, Pepe Serna, and Danny Trejo. Green Ghost is a well-put-together film that looks just as good as any superhero movie that we ever reviewed. Plus, it’s nice to have a superhero film where you get a bit of an antihero. It’s clear that this was a passion project by Charlie Clark and it’s a good one. I like the film very much and even though it’s not the best superhero movie ever made, it’s a funny, goofy, satirical action movie that’s just great entertainment. That’s something I can’t always say about a movie.  It’s one I think everybody should check out.  It may not get a wide release in theaters, so what, it’s definitely worth the rental, and I for one look forward to owning a copy on Blu-ray. It may not be the superhero movie we really wanted,  but it’s the one we need these days.   I applaud the efforts of Charlie Clark and his crew in making a fun Texas superhero movie that gives moviegoers pure entertainment.

“The Duke” Review | THE MAVERICK OPINION

Another Great British comedy that you should check out! Starring Helen Mirren and Jim Broadbent, the film is called The Duke. It’s about Kempton Bunton, a 60-year-old taxi driver who was accused of stealing Goya’s Portrait of the Duke of Wellington. And I have to say that this was a charming film that made me laugh and certainly appreciate the Great performances of Helen Mirren and Jim Broadbent.  Honestly, have they ever made a bad film! British comedies like these are always great for American audiences because it’s usually about something that we didn’t know much about and in a lot of cases, can relate to. Kempton was a humorous character who was always fighting for the common man, he would get fired from jobs because he stood up to bosses who treated minorities poorly. He would protest the government for unnecessary taxes. One of the most popular British taxes was on the ability to watch the BBC, you had to have a license which would be the equivalent of NBC CBS, or ABC charging to watch their stations if you had a simple TV antenna… Sometimes we don’t appreciate the fact that in other countries you had to pay to watch all TV and no TV station was completely free. But he became famous for the alleged crime of stealing a priceless painting and his trial brought shockwaves throughout British society in the 60s. He’s the type of character that we can all appreciate because he fights for the rights of the working man.

I enjoyed this movie. It’s not the best movie ever seen, but it’s a heartwarming and charming film with great performances. The entire cast does a great job in telling this funny and inspiring story that happened 60 years ago. I would say that Jim Broadbent is perfect for this character if you’ve ever watched any old footage of Kempton Bunton… He gives a delightful performance that will keep you laughing all the way to the end of the film. Overall, the pacing is good and the film doesn’t drag on. It’s only about 90 minutes so you won’t feel like you’re sitting there too long watching this movie. The movie doesn’t really need to be any longer than it is for you to know the basic story. And like most period films that are set in England, you will get a great history lesson of what it was like at that time, especially the political climate. In a lot of ways, it kind of reminds me of Pirate Radio.

But the film isn’t without its problems. Like all films that tell a true story, especially a historical one, there’s only so much of the story that you can really tell within a 90 or 120-minute run time. There’s obviously more to this story than what we’ve seen in the film. While I enjoyed the film immensely, it did leave me wanting to know more. It left me with more questions about the main characters and the aftermath of what happened. Sometimes a documentary works better in telling the overall story. I wonder if a documentary about what happened would not have been better. But a documentary can’t capture wonderful performances by great actors. The film’s biggest flaw is not pacing or unlikable characters that can distract you from the overall story, it’s that the film only centers on a small part of the overall story. I feel like as an audience we need to know more about these characters and how they got to the point where the painting was stolen. And we certainly want to know more about them after the trial, but the film only gives us a glimpse. If there’s one thing that this film does very well, it will make you curious enough to go do research on the characters and the whole story… Maybe that’s the point. After all, there’s only so much story you can tell in 90 minutes so it’s a bit of a catch-22. If it feels like a perfect 90-minute movie, it’s only part of the story.

Overall, it’s a good film, made great by the performances of Helen Mirren and Jim Broadbent. They create such likable characters that you root for them throughout the film and you want to know more about the real characters in the story. As I said before, the film is charming, and it will keep you laughing. It’s a nice distraction if you’re having a bad week. But I do think that a documentary about the whole story would be better. Then again, I don’t really want that because it can’t capture the great performance of Jim Broadbent who brought the character of Kempton Bunton to life. It’s definitely worth the price of a matinee at the theater with a nice glass of wine, but you certainly wouldn’t be wasting your money if you rent it on demand for dinner and movie night. There are so films that are a waste of time, this one is not so I encourage you to check it out… You will not be disappointed, even if you only watch it once!

Interview with Mark Wahlberg – “Father Stu” Review | THE MAVERICK OPINION


I love it when actors find a passion project because it’s those kinds of films that turn out to be better than most of what we see in the theater today. They’re better than the action movies that are devoid of any real plot or horror movies that are more bloody than suspenseful. The latest passion project by actor Mark Wahlberg is a movie titled Father Stu, about a former actor with a criminal past who ends up finding his calling we need to decide to become a priest. I know what you’re thinking, that can’t possibly be a real story, but as it turns out it is based on the life of Stuart Long. He was a former boxer from Montana who went to Los Angeles to pursue an acting career, got into a few scrapes with the law, and after a tragic motorcycle accident, actually becomes a priest. This movie is a heartwarming tale about a man who finds faith despite the tragic circumstances that happen to him; Stuart Long would die at the age of 50 from a degenerative muscle disorder.    I wouldn’t even characterize it as a Christian movie because it certainly isn’t preachy like something you would find on “Pureflix.” It’s just an inspiring story about an everyday man with dreams who has them cut short but finds faith in the end, maybe not so much a Christian faith, but faith in humanity and that no matter what tragedy befalls us, we can all still make a difference. And, I admit, I really did enjoy this movie. I didn’t think I would, but it’s one of those films that pleasantly surprised me and probably because this in a lot of ways was a perfect role for Mark Wahlberg.

I’ve always enjoyed Mark Wahlberg movies, whether they’re stupid comedies like The Other Guys or action movies like Lone Survivor or Four Brothers. He was great in The Departed. But his best movies have always been about men who in a lot of ways fell short of their potential only to rise up and become better than what they were. My favorite movie with him is always going to be The Fighter in this movie does make a few references to The Fighter. What makes this movie worth watching is Mark Wahlberg’s performance! It’s almost as if this was the perfect story for him to tell and in a lot of ways mirrors his own life. He was once a young, cocky actor who had a few scrapes with the law, but found his own faith which is very evident in the life that he lives now, especially with his family. In a lot of ways, there are mirror images of him and Stuart Long. In my interview with Mark Wahlberg, one of the things that I mentioned is I saw this character a lot like the Apostle Paul, someone who was reckless and not a very good person until he had an epiphany from God, thus giving him a calling. This movie works well in the fact that you get to see all the early parts of Father Stu’s life. Plus, the performances by Jackie Weaver and Mel Gibson, who play his parents are outstanding. They definitely deserve awards. The movie has a lot of heart and a lot of comedy, to the backdrop of Americana especially with the soundtrack. The music is a mixture of classic rock and outlaw country, which perfectly exemplifies the beauty of the film. And the movie beautifully displays how flawed all these characters really are and their own journey to find faith. I don’t necessarily characterize it as Christianity because, again, it’s not being preachy. The characters in the film are trying to be better human beings and that kind of faith goes beyond believing in God, but more importantly believing in each other and how we can all change For the better I think that’s the overall message of this film.

It’s not a perfect film, certainly not a perfect 10. There are better films about how people can change. One of the films that I compare Father Stu to is The Razor’s Edge, and I’ve always liked Bill Murray’s the best. If I had to be overly critical, I almost feel like they spent too much time telling his backstory and not focusing so much on him becoming a priest. Maybe it’s because Stuart Long wasn’t a priest all that long and compared to his life as a boxer or an actor. But I would have liked to have seen equal amounts of time telling these stories. There’s a lot of great stories of Stuart Long as a priest, especially when he went back to Montana and was essentially in a wheelchair going to prisons and community centers, becoming one of the most popular priests in that area. He was an inspiration and there should have more stories about that told in the film. There are also a few characters that we don’t get to tell their story as much as we should. I wish we had more of Teresa’s story, the love interest of Father Stu before he became a priest. I just don’t think the movie was as balanced as it could have been in telling all these great stories, especially that of Stuart’s father played by Mel Gibson.  In a lot of ways, maybe the story would have been better if it was a limited series of four to six episodes on a streaming channel. The film does leave you wanting to know more about Stuart Long and everybody involved.  That is certainly one of its weaknesses, but that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t watch it.  It’s a good story told in two hours.

Overall, Father Stu is a heartwarming and funny movie that can give you a renewed sense of faith in people. It’s hard not to feel inspired after watching this movie and perhaps it is the perfect movie to watch during Easter weekend. It is certainly one of Mark Wahlbergs’ top-five performances. Jackie Weaver and Mel Gibson deserve plenty of accolades for their brilliant performances. I thought this was one of Mel Gibson’s best movies. Maybe in some ways, it’s a sense of redemption for him for some of the crazy things he’s done in real life. Even if you are not a Christian or a person of faith, this is just a good story with great performances. You can still be inspired by somebody like Stuart Long, a man who found a calling and made a difference despite the tragic circumstances surrounding his life. Yes, it feels like a Reader’s Digest story, but we all need those from time to time. This is one of the best movies Mark Wahlberg could have done and we should be thankful that he brought the life of Stuart long to the big screen. I highly recommend this film even if you only watch it once, but I can pretty much guarantee that you won’t because it’s the kind of movie that’s worth watching more than once; if nothing else for the performances of its three stars. I also think it’s a great movie to see in the theater, especially if you need a feel-good movie and we all need those from time to time.

 

A Spy Thriller Double Feature with Chris Pine! “All the Old Knives” and “The Contractor” Film Reviews | THE MAVERICK OPINION

It’s an espionage double feature starring Chris Pine. That’s right, he has two espionage thrillers coming out within a week of one another, so for the purposes of this review we will look at both films. The first movie is All the Old Knives starting Chris Pine and Thandie Newton. This film is very much a slow burn and in a lot of ways feels like you’re watching Tinker Taylor Soldiers Spy. I admit, I did like the film even if it’s not the best spy film out there. It’s the kind of old-school espionage story where there’s not a lot of action but slowly draws you into the conspiracy at the heart of the story. This movie is about a rogue agent that has to be drawn out after an asset tells the CIA that one of their own has betrayed them. Chris Pine plays the character who has to find the truth. Classic espionage stories don’t really exist anymore, the best espionage stories always seem to take place during the Cold War, and even though intelligence gathering is still very prominent, it’s not like it used to be when America had one main adversary in the world. The best parts of this film are the performances and all the misdirection between the characters until we get to the truth. You won’t get a lot of action, but that also makes the story better.

I grew up reading Cold War espionage novels from great authors like John le Carré, Robert Ludlum, and Ian Fleming. Their stories were not about shootouts and in a lot of ways weren’t always about secret assassinations. At the heart of these stories were always agents who were trying to find secret information that could stop a war or find a mole, or even turn an enemy agent. That’s why this story feels like a classic espionage novel because the main part of the film is the conversation between Chris pine’s character and Thandie Newton’s character, leaving you to question yourself, whether one of them betrayed their country during a terrorist plot years before. I found myself not wanting either one of them to be a mole, both characters are sympathetic, and I think that’s marked by their brilliant performances. I could have sworn that this movie was from the 1950s. But the best part of this movie and what makes it worth watching is how their conversation is blended with flashbacks that help drive the story until you get to the end and are caught by surprise. The movie slowly draws you in. Everybody is great in this movie.

However, what I do complain about is even though it is a slow burn and the use of flashbacks is meant to give the story more action, we get a lot of needless conversation that draws out the ending and it makes this movie longer than what it needs to be. You could have easily cut out 15 minutes and made this movie better. But it’s also easy to ignore something like that when you have such great performances. And, I also have to complain that there isn’t enough action. I know that goes against everything that makes this film good, but putting action at the right moment does drive a story, it gives it the perfect pace and for the most, the heart of the story is just a conversation between the two main characters. I don’t necessarily mind cat-and-mouse games, it certainly works when it comes to heightening the intensity in the movie. However, there are times that this movie is a little too slow and takes a little too long to get to the point or even the misdirection that will keep you interested.

These are minor complaints. If you’re looking for an action spy thriller, then this is not it. It is a classic espionage story where the characters play a cat-and-mouse game to uncover the truth behind the CIA’s mole. If you know that going in, then you won’t be so bored by the movie, and I could see how an audience would be bored with it if they’re looking for action. This is definitely not a James Bond movie and it doesn’t need to be. Great storytelling can be effective when you slowly draw out the story only to be surprised in the end. But as I said before, it is the performances of Chris Pine and Thandie Newton that make this movie worth watching. Chris Pine is absolutely believable as a CIA agent, unlike the very lackluster Jack Ryan movie he did years ago. You’re sympathetic for the characters which can only be done if you have great performances. And the brilliant part of the story is there is no absolutely right answer in the end. If you’re a fan of classic espionage then you will enjoy this film. If you’d like to Tinker Taylor Soldier Spy, you’ll like this film, and you should definitely check it out on Amazon Prime.


The Contractor

The second espionage thriller with Chris Pine is The Contractor. It’s a high-octane thriller that reunites him with Ben Foster after they both had a great showing in the movie Hell or High water. The Contractor is far different than All the old Knives. If you’re craving action in an espionage movie, then this is the Chris Pine Movie for you. The best way I can describe it is it’s like Chris Pine decided to do a Bourne Identity movie. There’s not much to the story, but you will get a lot of action and I’m not saying that’s a bad thing. Chris Pine can definitely do an action role, he’s certainly believable. I could see him as Jason Bourne if Matt Damon had never done the role. The story is about an army special forces soldier who is drummed out of the military and in order to make enough money to stop drowning in debt, he accepts a job with his best friend being a private contractor. Essentially, he goes to work for a private special forces firm and when a job goes sideways, the best way for the company to clean up its mess is to kill all those who did the job. I don’t really consider this a spoiler because it’s not hard to figure out what’s going to happen.

First off, let’s just get this out of the way. This is not a great movie, the best parts of the movie are the action scenes. And if you’re looking for a repeat of the magic that Chris Pine had with Ben Foster from Hell or High water… Just go watch that movie again. Well, I don’t want to make the comparison to The Bourne Identity too much, I honestly feel like that’s what I was watching and if that’s the story you’re going to tell, isn’t this story better told in a series. The movie starts out a little slow but once the action starts, we’re off to the races until the very end and because the action moves so quickly, we don’t get that much of a story. That’s this movie’s biggest downfall, it doesn’t take the time to explore what could have been a great story on why Chris Pine’s character is betrayed and how he’s going to fix it in order to save his family. You can’t tell this kind of story in 1 hour and 45 minutes and expect it to be that good. This is the kind of story that needs six to eight episodes because there’s so much more happening behind the scenes than just some rogue leader of a private special forces unit who has to clean up his mess when everything goes wrong. Kiefer Sutherland plays the leader of this outfit and I found myself wanting to know more about his character. Nothing is really explained about his character.

Great espionage thrillers take the time to tell all parts of a story, especially the backstory. An important part of storytelling is how your characters got to where they are at the beginning of your movie or your series. You can certainly tell that throughout flashbacks and that’s one of the things they did in All the Old Knives really well. And unfortunately, there’s only two good scenes in this movie that bring out the human element to the story or more specifically make you care about the characters. One is the scene where Chris pines character is talking to the Marine who just tried to kill him and finds out more about who is trying to kill him. And the other scene is with the character who runs the safe house when they’re having dinner.

I enjoyed the action in this movie and Chris Pine was great at it, but to tell a great espionage thriller you have to have a proper amount of action and drama… The story can’t be all action. There are moments when as the audience, we have to catch our breath. A slow burn to the investigation within your story is just as important as the action sequences and there has to be a good balance between those things. I feel like with The Contractor they just went for action and that’s it. Like I said, it’s like they wanted to make their own version of The Bourne Identity. But here’s what does work in the film. The performances are great. Yes, we could have seen a lot more with Chris Pine’s character and Ben Foster’s character. All that could have been explored more if this had been a series, but they have great chemistry together and it is evident in this film. Kiefer Sutherland does make a great leader of a private special forces firm. It’s not like the casting wasn’t good, we just didn’t get as much with the characters as we could have if this had been a series. Like for example, J.D. Pardo, who played the Marine has a short amount of screen time and he is an actor that has a great presence on the screen and a lot of charisma. If you don’t know what I’m talking about then go watch Mayans MC… It’s almost a waste to have him in this film if you’re not going to let him do anything except a few fight scenes.

The idea for this movie was great, but they failed to deliver, simple as that. It’s okay for the action sequences, but the story seems familiar and there’s not enough backstory to make us really care about what’s going on. A good espionage thriller should make the audience have a vested interest in the story and sometimes that’s why you need the slow burn as I mentioned before. But the thing with great ideas is to be more than just an idea… you gotta deliver with the story, or you just have a wasted film or series, and more importantly, a waste of a great cast. Writers and directors have to give the actors something to work with. This is one of those films where I wouldn’t have minded a three-hour movie so it makes me wonder if this film was cut short by the studio and who’s to blame for wasting such a great idea and making what is a “B” version of a story we’ve already seen. This isn’t a movie that’s worth renting on premium high demand for $20 or even going to the theater to see. It may be worth a good rental just for the action, but sadly The Contractor doesn’t live up to what it could have been!

“The Bubble” (Netflix) Review | THE MAVERICK OPINION

Leave it to Judd Apatow to make a movie about shooting a film during the pandemic. We knew films like these were coming, but it’s always best to have a comedy instead of a serious and depressing movie to remind us of the horrible experiences that we had to go through. The film I’m talking about is The Bubble. Imagine being stuck at a remote location and having to quarantine for at least 14 days in one room before you can even start shooting. Now imagine that it’s the fifth sequel of a stupid action movie franchise where there will be a lot of CGI and over-the-top spectacles. The best way that I could describe this movie is it’s a cross between Tropic Thunder and the David Mamet film, State and Maine. It’s a film within a film and pretty much a mockumentary about making a film. I am certainly not knocking that idea because I think that those are some of the funniest movies around and let’s face it, Judd Apatow certainly has a flair for comedy. I really did enjoy this movie, so much so that I’ve already watched it twice and you should too on Netflix.

Here’s what makes this movie funny, it’s the great cast that they put together for the film who all have their roots in comedy. Of course, Leslie Mann will be in the film and she’s always great. But I think the two stars who almost steal this movie are Keegan-Michael Key and Karen Gillian. But it’s not jut them.  We are so used to seeing Pedro Pascal and more serious or action-oriented roles like the Mandalorian, I think people forget that he can be extremely funny in movies. And David Duchovny has a dry wit that makes him very humorous. And I dare you not to laugh at Fred Armisen. I even have to compliment Iris Apatow, the younger daughter of Judd and Leslie playing the self-centered, stuck-up, dancing pop star who is essentially just famous on TikTok.

Yes, it’s a wonderful cast and with the additions of very funny, comedic English actors, you have the makings of a hilarious film that will entertain you, especially when they’re making fun of big corporate studios who don’t really care about the actor’s best interest. This could have very easily have been tropic thunder during the pandemic. The story is simple, it’s about a group of actors trying to make this movie that has gone way over budget and is taking too long to make while being trapped by the studio. So, once they find out what’s up, they will escape at all costs. What makes this movie work…the performances, everybody’s great! I don’t think there’s anybody who makes this a lesser film. I’ve said it before, a great cast can always make a film better than what it is.

If I had to be critical and give you a few complaints about this movie, then I would say my biggest pet peeve is some of the camera angles as if you’re viewing the movie through the phone like you’re watching TikTok. As somebody who doesn’t really like that social media app, it was annoying at times. But it also works for the young pop star character who gets everybody to be in her dance videos. Essentially, they’re mocking these kinds of videos on TikTok, which I do very much enjoy. The only other critique I really have is that sometimes when you have so many funny actors in a film, they do kind of overshadow each other and it can be a little bit much. Yes, I’m saying that sometimes there could be too much comedy to where the really, really funny moments don’t seem that funny, but that also happens when you’re essentially making a mockumentary. And if you’re going to make a film about the film industry during the pandemic, that’s the only way you can do it. I do make comparisons to Tropic Thunder and sometimes there was a little too much comedy in there that you didn’t catch everything until you watch it two or three times, especially by Robert Downey Jr. It’s the same for this movie, but maybe that’s on purpose because  you should watch this movie more than once. However, I’m probably being overly critical at what is simply just a funny stupid movie that essentially makes fun of one of the worst times in our history, especially for the film industry and the only way to truly get through tough times is to find a way to laugh.

Judd Apatow has made an entertaining movie for Netflix that is worth watching and certainly more than once. There’s probably a certain truth to how actors tried to film during the pandemic or the Studio’s attitude when they might be facing financial hardships. But the best part of this film is all the great performances. All of the cast has great chemistry and just like the fictional cast that’s returning for the 5th sequel in a franchise, I could see everybody getting back together to make another movie. That’s the brilliance of Judd Apatow actors that work well with one another and that’s why you see some of the same actors popping up in his films. I don’t know if this film is worth a full-price movie ticket, but it is certainly worth watching in the theater with a little bit of day drinking. It’s even better at home when you’ve had a tough day and you need a good laugh. It won’t win any awards and that’s okay, but I think it’ll be one of those cult favorites that we come back to on Netflix 20 years down the road just like Tropic Thunder and perhaps that’s the best compliment I could give it. So, I encourage you to definitely check it out, it’ll be one of the best things you watch on Netflix!

Page 2 of 4

Powered by Mavericknes & Theme by The Business Pro Shop